تحلیل و ارزیابی شواهد فلسفی، عصب¬شناختی و تربیتی هوش¬های چندگانه گاردنر
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - دانشگاه تهران
کلید واژه: گاردنر, هوش, هوش¬های چندگانه, بهره هوشی,
چکیده مقاله :
نظریه هوشهای چندگانه گاردنر، یکی از پرنفوذترین نظریهها در حوزه شناخت هوش و ظرفیتهای شناختی ذهن انسان میباشد. این نظریه بهطور گسترده از سوی کارگزاران تربیتی در سطح دنیا، مورد پذیرش قرار گرفت و مقالات و کتابهای متعددی برای شیوه اثرگذاری و هدایت فرایندهای تربیتی بر مبنای این دیدگاه شکل گرفت. اما همزمان نقدهای سختی نیز از زوایای فلسفی، عصبشناختی و تربیتی به این دیدگاه وارد شده است. در کشور ما این نقدها مورد توجه قرار نگرفته و این دیدگاه با استقبالی کمنظیر به کار بسته شده و حتی به اسناد رسمی نیز راه یافته است. این مقاله با رویکردی تحلیلی، در سه حوزه فلسفی، علم اعصاب و تربیتی نقدهای وارد شده به این دیدگاه را مورد تحلیل قرار داده است و پاسخهای گاردنر و مدافعان دیدگاه وی را مورد سنجش قرار داده است. نتایج بررسی و تحلیل حاکی از آن است که دیدگاه گاردنر بهرغم پذیرش گسترده، با ابهامات و کاستیهای جدی مواجه است و لازم است در کاربرد آن احتیاط لازم صورت پذیرد.
Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences is one of the most influential theories in the field of intelligence and cognitive abilities of the human mind. In short, this theory is accepted by educational agents in the world, and numerous articles and books were written based on this point of view. But at the same time, there have been harsh criticisms from philosophical, neurological and educational angles to this view. In our country, these criticisms have been ignored, and this point of view enthusiastically has been welcomed and has even made its way into official documents. While, it has been faced with many counterevidence and its foundations have been faced with harsh criticisms that have often remained unanswered. With an analytical approach, this article has analyzed the criticisms made to this view in three fields of philosophy, neuroscience and education, and has evaluated the responses of Gardner and the defenders of his view. The results of investigation and analysis indicate that Gardner's point of view, despite its wide acceptance, is faced with serious ambiguities and shortcomings and it is necessary to be careful in its application.
آرمسترانگ، تامس (1396). هوش¬های چندگانه در کلاس درس (مهشید صفری، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات مدرسه.
دژگاهی، صغرا و حاجی مرادی، فرخنده (1392). تحلیل یادگیری بر اساس مقایسه سبک¬های شناختی و هوش چندگانه هوارد گاردنر. تهران: نشر علم.
شفلر، ایزرائیل (1382). در باب استعدادهای آدمی (ترجمه¬ی پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
فلیتهم، مایکل (1402). هوش¬های چندگانه (بهرام قاسمی¬نژاد، مترجم). تهران: نشر فراروان.
کوهن، تامس (1393). ساختار انقلاب¬های علمی (سعید زیباکلام، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
مجدفر، مرتضی؛ اصلانی، ابراهیم و سلیقه¬دار، لیلا (1394). دست¬نامه¬ی شهاب (راهنمای آموزگاران و مدیران). تهران: موسسه فرهنگی مدرسه برهان.
مکنزی، والتر (1391).هوش¬های چندگانه و تکنولوژی آموزشی (حسین زنگنه و مصطفی شیری¬پور، مترجمان). تهران: نشر آییژ.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1385). نظریه¬ی هوش¬های چندگانه و دلالت¬های آن برای برنامه درسی و آموزش. فصلنامه تعلیموتربیت، 88، صص: 7-31.
Asodan, F. (2017). The Problematic Search for The Nature of Intelligence: Philosophical Reactions and Projections. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 143-165. https://philpapers.org/archive/FATTPS.pdf.
Benisz, M., Willis, J. O., & Dumon, R. (2018). Abuses and Misuses of Intelligence Tests: Facts and Misconceptions. In A. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Pseudoscience: The conspiracy against science, (pp. 351–373). Boston Review. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037426.003.0016
Cave, S. (2020). Intelligence: A History. Retrieved from: https://aeon.co/essays/on-the-dark-history-of-intelligence-as-domination
Chomsky, N. (2009). A Conversation About Multiple Intelligences, An Interview with Noam Chomsky. In Shearer (Ed.), MI at 25; Assessing the Impact and Future of Multiple Intelligences for Teaching and Learning. B. (pp. 25-31). New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Ferrero, M. Vadillo M. A. & Leon S. P. (2021). A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies. Intelligence, 88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566.
Furnham, A. & Horne, G. (2021). Myths and misconceptions about intelligence: A study of 35 myths. The Journal of Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111014
Gardner, M. H. (2020). A Synthesizing Mind: A Memoir from the Creator of Multiple Intelligences Theory. Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.
Gardner, H., M. (2016). Intelligence Isn’t Black-and-White: There Are 8 Different Kinds. Retrieved from: https://bigthink.com/videos/howard-gardner-on-the-eight-intelligences/
Gardner, M. H. (2011a). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books Press.
Gardner, M. H. (2011b). The Unschooled Mind. New York: Basic Books Press.
Gardner, M. H. (2006a). Reply to John White. In J., A. Schaler (Ed.), Howard Gardner Under Fire: the rebel psychologist faces his critics. (pp. 295-297). Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press.
Gardner, M. H. (2006b). On failing to grasp the core of MI theory: A response to Visser et al. Intelligence, 34(5), 503–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.04.002
Gardner, M. H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books Press.
Gardner, M. H. (1998). A Reply to Perry D. Klein's "Multiplying the Problems of Intelligence by Eight". Canadian Journal of Education, 23(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585968.
Gardner, M. H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. New York: Basic Books Press.
Gardner, M. H. & Moran, S. (2006). The Science of Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_2
Hauser, M. (2009). Neuroscience and Multiple Intelligences Theory: Barriers and Bridges? An Interview with Marc Hauser. In MI at 25; Assessing the Impact and Future of Multiple Intelligences for Teaching and Learning. B. Shearer (Ed.)(pp. 32-39). New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Hosseini, S. A. H. (2014). How to write a critical review article. Retrieved From: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260554909
Klein, P. D. (1998). A Response to Howard Gardner: Falsifiability, Empirical Evidence, and Pedagogical Usefulness in Educational Psychologies. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585969
Klein, P. D. (1997). Multiplying the Problems of Intelligence by Eight: A Critique of Gardner's Theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585790.
Kornhaber, M. L. (2020). The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. 2nd. (pp. 659-678). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lanz, P. (2000). The Concept of Intelligence in Psychology and Philosophy. H. Cruse; J Dean & H. Ritter (Eds.), Prerational Intelligence: Adaptive Behavior and Intelligent Systems Without Symbols and Logic, Volume 1, Volume 2 Prerational Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Behavior of Natural and Artificial Systems, Volume 3. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0870-9_3
Legg, S. & Hutter, M. (2007). A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms, 17–24.
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). A History of Research on Intelligence – Part 2: Psychological Theory, Research, and Practice in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 18-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Intelligence. In K. Freedheim & I., B. Weiner (Eds.)Handbook of Psychology, (pp. 135-156). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence; How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life. New York: Penguin Press.
Torrijos-Muelas, M; González-Víllora, S. & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol., https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923.
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). Beyond g: Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34(5), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.004
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). g and the measurement of Multiple Intelligences: A response to Gardner, 34(5), 507-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.04.006.
Waterhouse, L. (2023). Why Multiple Intelligences Theory is a Neuromyth. Front. Psychol, Vol. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217288
Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1
White, J. (2008). Illusory Intelligences? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3), 611-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00643.x
White, J. (2006). Multiple Invalidities. In . J., A. Schaler (Ed.), Howard Gardner Under Fire: the rebel psychologist faces his critics (pp. 45-71). Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press.
White, J. (2004). Howard Gardner: The Myth of Multiple Intelligences. This paper is based on a lecture given at Institute of Education University of London.